improve claude code review

.github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml

@@ -1,76 +1,40 @@
-name: Claude Code Review
+name: Claude Experimental Review Mode
 
 on:
-  pull_request:
+  issue_comment:
-    types: [opened, synchronize]
+    types: [created]
-    # Optional: Only run on specific file changes
-    # paths:
-    #   - "src/**/*.ts"
-    #   - "src/**/*.tsx"
-    #   - "src/**/*.js"
-    #   - "src/**/*.jsx"
 
 jobs:
-  claude-review:
+  code-review:
-    # Optional: Filter by PR author
+    # Run when someone comments "@claude review" on a PR conversation
-    # if: |
+    if: |
-    #   github.event.pull_request.user.login == 'external-contributor' ||
+      github.event.issue.pull_request &&
-    #   github.event.pull_request.user.login == 'new-developer' ||
+      contains(github.event.comment.body, '@claude review')
-    #   github.event.pull_request.author_association == 'FIRST_TIME_CONTRIBUTOR'
-
     runs-on: ubuntu-latest
     permissions:
       contents: read
-      pull-requests: read
+      pull-requests: write
-      issues: read
+      issues: write
       id-token: write
 
     steps:
       - name: Checkout repository
         uses: actions/checkout@v4
         with:
-          fetch-depth: 1
+          fetch-depth: 0 # Full history for better diff analysis
 
-      - name: Run Claude Code Review
+      - name: Code Review with Claude (Experimental)
-        id: claude-review
         uses: anthropics/claude-code-action@beta
         with:
-          claude_code_oauth_token: ${{ secrets.CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN }}
+          mode: experimental-review
+          anthropic_api_key: ${{ secrets.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY }}
+          timeout_minutes: "30"
+          custom_instructions: |
+            Focus on:
+            - Code quality and maintainability
+            - Security vulnerabilities
+            - Performance issues
+            - Best practices and design patterns
 
-          # Optional: Specify model (defaults to Claude Sonnet 4, uncomment for Claude Opus 4)
+            Be constructive and provide specific suggestions for improvements.
-          # model: "claude-opus-4-20250514"
+            Use GitHub's suggestion format when proposing code changes.
-
-          # Direct prompt for automated review (no @claude mention needed)
-          direct_prompt: |
-            Please review this pull request and provide feedback on:
-            - Code quality and best practices
-            - Potential bugs or issues
-            - Performance considerations
-            - Security concerns
-
-            Be constructive and helpful in your feedback.
-
-          # Optional: Use sticky comments to make Claude reuse the same comment on subsequent pushes to the same PR
-          # use_sticky_comment: true
-
-          # Optional: Customize review based on file types
-          # direct_prompt: |
-          #   Review this PR focusing on:
-          #   - For TypeScript files: Type safety and proper interface usage
-          #   - For API endpoints: Security, input validation, and error handling
-          #   - For React components: Performance, accessibility, and best practices
-          #   - For tests: Coverage, edge cases, and test quality
-
-          # Optional: Different prompts for different authors
-          # direct_prompt: |
-          #   ${{ github.event.pull_request.author_association == 'FIRST_TIME_CONTRIBUTOR' &&
-          #   'Welcome! Please review this PR from a first-time contributor. Be encouraging and provide detailed explanations for any suggestions.' ||
-          #   'Please provide a thorough code review focusing on our coding standards and best practices.' }}
-
-          # Optional: Add specific tools for running tests or linting
-          # allowed_tools: "Bash(npm run test),Bash(npm run lint),Bash(npm run typecheck)"
-
-          # Optional: Skip review for certain conditions
-          # if: |
-          #   !contains(github.event.pull_request.title, '[skip-review]') &&
-          #   !contains(github.event.pull_request.title, '[WIP]')