The recent accent-colour setting only reached part of the desktop.
looks.lua still hardcoded the focused-window border and glow to blue,
so any hyprctl reload -- or every fresh session, for about a second --
reverted a chosen accent; it now reads accentName the same way it
already read colorScheme. The lock screen and terminal stayed blue
regardless of the chosen accent despite the setting's own description
claiming otherwise; panama-lock and panama-theme-apps now resolve and
apply the real accent.
AccentPicker built its swatch model from Theme.accents directly
instead of the schema's own options list, so the two could drift
silently; switched it to read the schema. Its hit target only covered
the swatch, not the name label added specifically for colour-vision
accessibility -- extended to the whole row. Settings search had no
route for the "appearance" group, so searching for the accent or
colour scheme landed on Home.
ColorScheme's hex-to-Hyprland helper assumed 6-digit colours and would
silently corrupt a future translucent one; fixed it to read from the
end of the string instead of the start. An accent-only change no
longer reruns the full colour-scheme pipeline. The gradient it builds
for the focused border now goes through SystemSettings' existing
serialiser instead of a second, under-escaped copy of the same logic.
The settings-ownership contract test enforced the old rule that
ColorScheme must never touch the focused border; updated it to verify
the real, intended rule instead of contradicting the code.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E6TJUAh41HaP25MVHWkhRZ
Phase 4, first slice. Theme.qml hardcoded the Prism pair, so the one
thing that carries every state meaning in the desktop -- focused, active,
on -- was the one thing nobody could change. 74 files read Theme.accent,
so making it a setting moves all of them at once.
Named accents rather than a colour picker, which is the design decision
worth defending. One hex cannot serve both schemes: a colour legible on
the Moon background is usually illegible on the Day one, and a picker
that lets someone build an unreadable desktop is not a feature. So each
name carries a curated pair per scheme, and every one of the sixteen
resulting colours measures at least 3:1 against the ground it sits on --
checked, not assumed. It is also GNOME's model, which is the parity
being chased.
The focused window border comes with it, and only because the ownership
rule made that safe. ColorScheme owns the inactive border as a
scheme-relative contrast role; the focused Prism border is the accent
role owned by the theme. Writing it from the accent would have been
reckless before that boundary existed, since a scheme change would have
erased the user's choice. Both borders are now pushed together, because
each accent carries separate light and dark pairs, so switching schemes
must restate the focused border too.
The gradient is written as a Lua table, not a string. The string form
carries only one stop, and passing two as a string is accepted and
silently keeps the previous value.
Swatches are drawn as the gradient they produce rather than as flat
dots, because the gradient is what is being chosen. Each carries its
name permanently rather than in a tooltip: telling swatches apart by
colour is precisely what someone with a colour vision deficiency cannot
do, which is also why the palette is named in the first place.
Verified end to end by switching to rose and watching the compositor
report eeff757f/eec099ff, then reverting.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BRvzt4H8XXLPVH5MyYdk9L
Gabriel Brown