colour -> color, behaviour -> behavior, centre -> center, favourite ->
favorite, and about twenty other pairs, applied consistently across
comments, docs, error/UI copy, and a handful of QML identifiers that
used the British spelling as their actual name: SystemSettings'
serialiseValue/serialiseTable/normaliseGradient, Displays'
normaliseModes, Wallpaper's normalisePolicy, SettingsBackup's
serialiseHomeState, DateTime's ntpSynchronised property, Clipboard's
_normalise helper, and ShortcutCapture's cancelled signal (with its
onCancelled handler in ShortcutsPage.qml). Every call site and the two
tests that assert on the literal source text (settings-ownership and
settings-backup-live contracts) were updated in lockstep.
Left untouched: config/dot/espanso/match/packages/misspell-en/ is a
vendored third-party autocorrect dictionary -- its entries are typo
corrections, not our prose, and rewriting them would fight the
package's own purpose (and any future re-sync from upstream).
The already-American `favorites` property (Home page pinned
accessories) was never actually misspelled -- only nearby comments and
error strings said "favourites" -- so no data migration was needed
there.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E6TJUAh41HaP25MVHWkhRZ
Found by codex's GNOME Tweaks audit and verified against the compositor:
`hyprctl descriptions` publishes input:follow_mouse as
map: [{"separate":3},{"detached":2},{"follow":1},{"disabled":0}].
Panama labelled 0 "Never", 1 "Click to focus", 2 "Sloppy focus". So this
desktop, sitting on the shipped value of 1, has been running
focus-follows-pointer the whole time while Settings called it "Click to
focus" -- and the way to actually GET click-to-focus was to choose
"Never". Value 3 was not offered at all. hypr/input.lua carried the same
wrong claim in a comment.
The shipped VALUE is left alone. Which focus mode this desktop should
use is a behaviour decision rather than a correction, and all four are
now reachable from Settings.
Nothing could have caught this. The compositor accepts 1, reads back 1,
and the write contract passes: the value is valid, it just means
something other than the label. The only authority on what each number
MEANS is the compositor, and it publishes that. So enum-hypr-map-contract
now checks every compositor-backed enum against the published map --
that offered values exist, and that published values are offered, since
a missing one is a capability nobody can reach.
Writing it immediately found two more of the same: variable refresh rate
offered Off and fullscreen-games while the compositor publishes four
(always-on and fullscreen-only were unreachable, and fullscreen-only is
what someone wanting VRR for video rather than games wants), and direct
scanout was missing its always-on value. Both now offer everything, with
a detail line per option rather than a bare word.
Verified the contract catches the original followMouse gap and a value
outside the map.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BRvzt4H8XXLPVH5MyYdk9L
Gabriel Brown