Phase 3 of the fresh-install spec: the parts of a run that depend on what the
machine actually is. NVIDIA, Secure Boot, Fedora's preinstalled extras, firmware.
Two of these looked like they would force a compromise, and neither did.
sunhat opened an editor in the middle of its run so grub could be hand-corrected,
and that single step is why walking away from an install did not work. The step
existed to delete duplicated kernel arguments -- and grubby replaces an argument
that already exists rather than appending a second copy, so the duplicates cannot
accumulate and there is nothing to correct. The editor was load-bearing for a
problem that a different tool does not have.
MOK enrolment needs a password now and the same password at the next boot's blue
screen, which reads like a prompt that has to happen mid-run. mokutil has
--generate-hash and --hash-file for exactly this: the interview asks, hashes it
on the spot, and records only the hash. The plaintext never reaches the answers
file, the environment, or a command line, and the stage runs without asking.
The stage runs last rather than fourth as the spec's table had it. The constraint
was always "late" and fourth of eight is not late: enrolment arms a prompt for the
next boot and firmware may want a reboot, so a machine that reboots out of this
stage should already be completely configured.
Every question names what was found -- the card, the packages actually installed
-- and is not asked at all on a machine it would do nothing to. sunhat's debloat
list no longer describes Fedora 44: totem became showtime and LibreOffice is not
preinstalled, so the list is curated and a package that is not installed is never
passed to dnf, which is what lets it outlive a release.
This stage cannot be verified by running it. It installs a proprietary driver and
queues a Secure Boot enrolment, and this machine is an AMD desktop. So every
privileged command is stood in on PATH and the contract asserts which answer led
to which call: that no answers means no commands, that a failed driver install is
not followed by arguments and services for a driver that is not there, that the
hash reaches mokutil through a file and never a command line, and that removal is
offered only for packages that are installed. The contract was checked by breaking
the stage three ways and confirming it caught each. It does not verify that
akmod-nvidia builds, and says so where a reader would otherwise assume it did.
The README's stage table listed three of seven stages; the interview and identity
work never reached it. Corrected rather than extended, since a table that lists
three of seven is worse than one that lists none. The Desktops section still
describes a GNOME session nothing installs -- that is phase 5.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NvgBuSWB5sE43yWmg21ozj
It is the system settings app for this desktop, so it is named the way
one is. The window is "Settings", the titlebar is "Settings", the
wordmark above the search field is gone, the sidebar's last row is
"About", and the status line reads "Desktop is healthy".
Prose followed the same rule. Forty-odd strings explained what "Panama"
does -- "Panama never animates while idle", "Restore Panama defaults",
"Panama looks in ~/Pictures/Wallpapers" -- which is how a product
describes itself, not how a settings panel describes a setting. They now
say what happens. No user-visible "Panama" remains anywhere in the app.
Two consequences worth naming:
The SUPER+I shortcut's description is user-visible, because the
Shortcuts page is generated from it, so that is renamed too. Rebindings
are keyed by shipped chord rather than description, so no existing
override is orphaned by this.
Three contracts matched the window by title and one matched that
shortcut by description; all four are updated. There are no Hyprland
window rules keyed on the title, so nothing about the window's placement
changes.
The desktop entry is now Name=Settings, but the FILE keeps its
panama-settings name, as does the icon: the dock pins applications by
desktop id, and renaming the file would silently unpin it.
dock-pins-contract covers exactly that.
The dated design docs under docs/superpowers keep the old name. They are
a record of what was decided when, and editing them to agree with the
present would make them lie about the past.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BRvzt4H8XXLPVH5MyYdk9L
Gabriel Brown
gib