Managing a stored credential meant installing Seahorse. The keyring
rows on Privacy could say whether it was locked and nothing about what
was in it.
Four rules, each pinned by a contract, because each is a way this could
leak the thing it exists to protect:
Listing never reads values. Enumerating reports labels and attributes;
it does not ask the keyring to hand over what it is protecting.
A secret never reaches a command line. /proc makes argv readable by
every process on this machine, so a password passed as an argument is
published to all of them. The helper reads the value in process and
writes it to wl-copy on stdin.
A secret never reaches an error message, a log, or a QML property. An
exception raised while holding a password does not get to choose what
text is printed, so the clipboard tool's stderr is discarded rather
than echoed.
Forgetting one is irreversible, so the first press asks and the second
does it, and the confirming button is the only one wearing danger.
The list is collapsed until asked for: opening Privacy should not
enumerate someone's passwords as a side effect. A copied value clears
itself about a minute later, but only if the clipboard still holds it --
the guard compares a SHA-256, so the waiting process never has the
password.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BRvzt4H8XXLPVH5MyYdk9L
The keyring is already unlocked at sign-in exactly as GNOME does it --
pam_gnome_keyring is in GDM's stack and the journal confirms it works
("gnome-keyring-daemon started properly and unlocked keyring"). So there
was no configuration bug to fix. What a bare Hyprland session lacks is
anywhere to see when that has stopped being true.
It stops being true rarely and expensively. gnome-keyring-daemon crashed
once on this machine -- an upstream abort in service_method_open_session,
with a core dump -- and D-Bus then activated a replacement. That
replacement never received the login password, so the keyring was locked
in the middle of a session that had unlocked it correctly at login.
Nothing announces this. What you see instead is a mail account that will
not authenticate, a git push that cannot find its key, or an integration
reporting "not configured", none of which mention keyrings. That is the
same root cause as the Home Assistant token failure earlier.
Privacy & Security now shows the state, offers an Unlock action that
raises the standard password dialog, and reports when the daemon holding
your secrets is a D-Bus replacement rather than PAM's -- because a
replacement that is currently unlocked was unlocked by hand and will not
survive a restart. The password never passes through Panama.
The contract stubs the secret service rather than touching the real one:
locking the login keyring breaks every saved password on the machine and
can only be undone by typing the password into a dialog, so it is not
something a test suite may do to a daily driver. Verified it catches a
helper that misreports locked as unlocked, and one that crashes instead
of reporting a missing service.
Worth recording: a locked keyring makes a NON-INTERACTIVE caller appear
to hang. It is not hung -- it is waiting on a dialog nobody is looking
at, which is exactly how the earlier secret-tool investigation lost an
hour.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BRvzt4H8XXLPVH5MyYdk9L
Gabriel Brown