Both tests run against the live session and capture "what it was before"
so they can put it back. Neither checked that what they found was sane,
so one interrupted run poisoned every run after it -- and because each
subsequent run faithfully restored the bad value, the desktop stayed
broken while the failure looked like an ordinary flake.
displays-contract left the monitor at scale 1.25 after a failed revert.
The next run recorded 1.25 as the original and restored the desktop to
it. It now reads the shipped scale out of monitors.lua and refuses to
run when the live display disagrees. A failure to parse that value is
fatal rather than skipped, because silently skipping the check is how
the laundering happened in the first place.
focus-session-expiry kills and restarts the shell mid-session, so an
interrupted run leaves caffeine on with nothing left to turn it off. The
next `focus start` recorded "previously on", handed it back on expiry,
and failed the assertion that caffeine ends off -- identically, forever,
with the desktop unable to idle or lock the entire time. It now refuses
to start unless caffeine is already off, which is the only state in
which the test can tell "restored correctly" from "never released".
Both guards name the exact command to recover with. Verified each fires
on a dirty state and passes on a clean one; caffeine was found latched
on this machine and has been released.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BRvzt4H8XXLPVH5MyYdk9L
Resolution, refresh rate, scale, and rotation, applied through
hl.monitor{} and stored per output.
This is the only setting in Panama where a wrong value can leave the
user unable to SEE the screen well enough to undo it: a mode the panel
cannot show, or a scale that makes everything unreadable, is not
recoverable through the UI that caused it. So a change is never applied
irreversibly. It is applied, then reverted automatically after fifteen
seconds unless confirmed, and confirming is what writes it to the
settings store -- letting the countdown run leaves nothing behind.
The contract tests that property specifically: it applies a scale, waits
out the countdown, and asserts the display came back and that nothing
was stored. A regression there is not a broken feature, it is a user
staring at a blank monitor.
Modes are grouped by resolution with refresh rates beside them. The
panel reports 35, many differing only in refresh-rate rounding -- 60.00
and 59.94 -- which as a flat list of buttons is noise rather than
choice; equal rounded pairs collapse, leaving 21.
Only mode, scale, and transform are configurable. Colour management and
bit depth stay in monitors.lua because they carry a documented screencopy
tradeoff that a settings page cannot explain at the moment you would be
changing it.
Also replaces the display policy rows with the schema-bound ones, so the
page no longer restates labels that PreferenceSchema already holds.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BRvzt4H8XXLPVH5MyYdk9L
Gabriel Brown