Found by codex's GNOME Tweaks audit and verified against the compositor:
`hyprctl descriptions` publishes input:follow_mouse as
map: [{"separate":3},{"detached":2},{"follow":1},{"disabled":0}].
Panama labelled 0 "Never", 1 "Click to focus", 2 "Sloppy focus". So this
desktop, sitting on the shipped value of 1, has been running
focus-follows-pointer the whole time while Settings called it "Click to
focus" -- and the way to actually GET click-to-focus was to choose
"Never". Value 3 was not offered at all. hypr/input.lua carried the same
wrong claim in a comment.
The shipped VALUE is left alone. Which focus mode this desktop should
use is a behaviour decision rather than a correction, and all four are
now reachable from Settings.
Nothing could have caught this. The compositor accepts 1, reads back 1,
and the write contract passes: the value is valid, it just means
something other than the label. The only authority on what each number
MEANS is the compositor, and it publishes that. So enum-hypr-map-contract
now checks every compositor-backed enum against the published map --
that offered values exist, and that published values are offered, since
a missing one is a capability nobody can reach.
Writing it immediately found two more of the same: variable refresh rate
offered Off and fullscreen-games while the compositor publishes four
(always-on and fullscreen-only were unreachable, and fullscreen-only is
what someone wanting VRR for video rather than games wants), and direct
scanout was missing its always-on value. Both now offer everything, with
a detail line per option rather than a bare word.
Verified the contract catches the original followMouse gap and a value
outside the map.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BRvzt4H8XXLPVH5MyYdk9L
Gabriel Brown
0c4d132ee1